Geithner arrested AGAIN

In January 2010, Christopher Story* of the Soviet Analyst wrote a pretty sensational report, contending that Timothy Geithner and Hank Paulson had been arrested for fraud on a monumental scale. Since it was not reported in the 'mainstream' media, it was difficult to corroborate.

Around the same time, Judge Napolitano loosed an exposé on the fraud perpetrated by Paulson on behalf of Goldman Sachs, via AIG. The corporate media barely covered this at the time.

Now, documents exist which link Geithner, Paulson, Goldman Sachs and AIG in an almighty fraud operation - for which Geithner was just recently arrested.




Was Christopher Story right? I don't know.  But it will be interesting, as events unfold, to refer to his report ...

Something to think about on budget day.

---

* Christopher Story died of a "short illness" in July 2010.

---

Update: The above video appears to be from Jan 2010. Plenty of chatter on the Internet about his arrest, but as yet, nothing in the media.

But:

"Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner has been subpoenaed again to testify at a hearing of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Affairs about the $182.3 billion bailout of American International Group Inc.(AIG)."

And, from last month:

Lehman Brothers Subpoenas Geithner In J.P. Morgan Fight

Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (LEHMQ) and its creditors late Thursday said they want to subpoena Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner to question him under oath over allegations J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., (JPM) illegally siphoned billions of dollars from the collapsing investment bank in the days before it filed for the largest bankruptcy in U.S. history.
In a filing accompanying Lehman's filing, made in U.S. District Court in Washington, Lehman's official committee of unsecured creditors said Geithner has thus far refused to comply with an Aug. 9, 2011, subpoena, and it wants a court to force Geithner to give a deposition by a March 16 deadline.

"Despite being a crucial fact witness on these issues, Secretary Geithner has refused to appear at a deposition in accordance with a valid subpoena issued by the Committee," the committee's lawyers said in the filing. Geithner was president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York at the time of the Lehman collapse.

More later ...

Roger Helmer's maiden speech at UKIP Spring Conference 2012

Welcome aboard Mr H!



Now we need to work on other Conservative MPs with integrity, like Dan Hannan and Douglas Carswell. It might just trigger that stampede to UKIP that this country so desperately needs ... before it's too late.

We are England, of roses rape and revolution

We might believe that "they" are strong while we are weak, that they have power while we have none.  But we would be wrong.

We are fighting an information war against the power elite. And while they might have all of our money to throw at enslaving us, we have one powerful weapon on our side which they simply do not have or cannot employ: truth.


A lie told must be maintained, spawning new lies and fractures in the liar's narrative as inconsistencies, contradictions and absurdities become apparent.

The truth needs no embellishment and no maintenance. When truth is spread, it cannot be unspread.




Hat tip: Anon, over at Cap'n Ranty's place

Whitehall graft and waste

Sue Cameron has been poring over government data on Whitehall waste and finds graft:

"They show that police busts have uncovered caches of fraudulent documents that have been used to obtain everything from disabled badges and concessionary travel passes to UK visas, housing benefits and even taxi driver licences."

In other words, whole 'industries' have been built up around government 'goods'. Were these goods not on offer on the first place, there would be no graft.

There is no money, says Osborne. Well then, stop spending it.

Get rid of licences and immediately we rid ourselves of the need to administer them, regulate them and stop civil servants and rent-seekers from ripping the system off. Suddenly, a whole swathe of special interests simply disappears and ceases to be a problem.

Don't take my word for it...

---

Corruptissima republica, plurimae leges. (The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws.)"

Tacitus

Watch the magician's other hand

Allegedly, May wants to break up the Ministry of Justice (sic) and Paul Goodman thinks this would be futile. But I'm not so sure.

Abolishing, splitting and merging departments has one great benefit: it allows civil servants to be moved around and pockets of self-interest to be broken up. This is particularly useful where group think is found, or where a department or sub-department consistently fails to deliver due to some ideological bent which might be at odds with the declared purpose of the department.

That said, I'm a little suspicious of changes being made to the justice departments, at a time when so much constitutional meddling and malfeasance is threatening to cause something of a political / constitutional crisis.

Reorganising a department means changing stats; a great way to manipulate them.

Watch the hand to which the magician is not drawing your attention ...

Eurozone Reality

This rather colourful (if typo-ridden) comment to AEP's latest article sums up the anger of a growing number of people:

Firget all the numbers,   they are just a smokescreen

Look at reality

The ECB has to do all of this  for one simple reason.
The dirty filthy lying corrupt scheming depraved criminals that started this disgusting inception and then gave birth to the filthy turd called the euro, that they have since used to cripple democracy, steal hundreds of billions from europeans, bankupt  hundreds of thousands of
businesses and impoverish tens if not hundreds of millions of europeans, drive living stamdards down to post war levels and in some cases pre war levels across parts of southern europe, created strife, demonstrations, toppled governments and caused the longest most unholy
effing cock up in the history of europe.

For what..

For the simple reason that these ignorant diabolical sanctimonious, self aggrandinsing filth can strut their way across world stages and preen and pose and ponce about and try to look important.

Well guess what..

I am not fooled. I see these arrogant scum for exactly what they are.

The most evil scum in Europe who will lie and steal and manipulate and take everything you have to keep thier venner of respectabilty.

They are risible, criminal and utterly corrupt and utterly incompetent.

They should all burn in hell.

In 10 years , forget all else,, just look at the carnage of their  handiwork.

Does anyone need to say anymore,

Just ask any Greek or Spaniard Or Italian or Irish Portuguese what benefits this wonderful scam has brought to thier countries. 

The evidence just keeps piling up. Who can deny the thrust of his posting?

UKIP Nigel Farage met Angel Merkel - 21st Feb 12

Hat tip: UKIPMedia

Resurrecting the teaching of history

Janet Daley observes that in order to celebrate British culture, we have to first know what it is. But the dire state of history teaching in our dumbed down state school drone factories is hardly going to strengthen self-belief when all it teaches is self-loathing.

If we don't wish to repeat the mistakes of history, we'd best learn from it and we're going to have to take it upon ourselves to:

• further educate ourselves and
• educate the younger generation.

The government won't do it and in any case, why would we want it to? We have enough propaganda to contend with via the BBC and 'embedded' journalists of the corporate media.

We could do with a Wiki-history-type site, free to all, giving voice to historical perspectives that the government does not promote. For example, Antony Sutton's "Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler" alone is highly useful in helping the reader to deconstruct the propaganda arising from the Eurozone. It quite clearly shows the long-term patterns and plans of countries over the past century which are playing out today.

Or, we could adopt the approach taken by the free Khan Academy, (endorsed by Lew Rockwell in articles and interviews), which offers a comprehensive range of courses for homeschoolers of all ages.

Given the staggering cost of higher and further education in this country and the aversion that most people now have to acquiring debt in return for an 'education', might this not be a good time to explore new educational paradigms and models?

Any independent historians out there willing to give it a go? David Starkey?

Common law: judge-made law or jury-made justice?

David T Breaker correctly calls "Human Rights" the enemy of freedom.

Common law provides adequate protection, provided that jury trials remain prevalent.

Under common law, anyone who harms can be sued and the merits of the case deliberated over by a jury of peers. Ergo, where there is no harm, nobody sues.

The State has taken over the function of 'justice' where it should instead be concerned with securing our liberties. The State has it 180 degrees wrong.

The State legislates and as it does so, it subconsciously or consciously picks winners. Each statute, in some way, discriminates against or coddles some "group", which then has to be defined. If not defined, the law is open-ended - a gift for lawyers.

Statutes end up having to be rectified by more legislation, as unintended (or intended) negative consequences become apparent.

Thus, the law becomes more and more complicated such that only lawyers can unravel its labyrinthine meanderings and occult meanings.

The result is that 'justice' becomes expensive - too expensive for most people.

Ask the average person "what is the purpose of a jury?", and he will probably tell you that it is to decide as to the guilt or innocence of the defendant.

In fact, one of the most important roles of the jury is to determine whether the law itself is just. This has the effect of tempering the tyranny of legislators.

That is why many in the HoL, HoC and the civil service are beavering away behind the scenes to do away with jury trials. These people ought to be rooted out and exposed.

Some contend that jury trial is "judge-made law". I would argue that it is jury-made justice.

What if? Was this the speech that got Judge Napolitano fired?

I'd download the video if I were you, folks. I can't imagine this being available on Youtube for long.



Ring any bells?