Tuesday, 27 October 2009
Climate Change Treaty: Glenn Beck interviews Lord Monckton
On 19th October 2009, just ahead of the US government signing the UN's Climate Change Treaty, Glenn Beck interviewed Lord Monckton who is visiting the US in an effort to kill the treaty.
As Monckton eloquently explains, it is designed to herald in World Communism, lately touted as World Government, on the back of the global warming scam.
Every nation that signs it will thereby cede its sovereignty to the UN while wealth passes from the 'rich' nations to the 'developing' nations.
One assumes that one of the developing nations feeling hard done by is China, given that it thinks we've had an unfair head start on it. Never mind that without the West's technical know-how, bestowed upon it by the US and Europe, it would still be in the dark ages.
(Two- part autoplay):
Hat tip: Banned
As Monckton eloquently explains, it is designed to herald in World Communism, lately touted as World Government, on the back of the global warming scam.
Every nation that signs it will thereby cede its sovereignty to the UN while wealth passes from the 'rich' nations to the 'developing' nations.
One assumes that one of the developing nations feeling hard done by is China, given that it thinks we've had an unfair head start on it. Never mind that without the West's technical know-how, bestowed upon it by the US and Europe, it would still be in the dark ages.
(Two- part autoplay):
Hat tip: Banned
Labels:
communism,
follow the money,
Glenn Beck,
Global warming con,
Monckton,
NWO
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)




2 comments:
After defining it entirely, in your opinion, would communism be successful? Why would a system that distributes wealth equitably to everyone be frowned upon? Why would people want social classes and disparities? Does it give too much power to the government?
Wherever communism has been tried, it has failed. There are many reasons for this, and here are a few:
1)
Communism reduces peoples' lives (except for the political classes who live exceedingly well) to drearines - bone-aching soullessness.
It reduces people's freedoms because however much we would like it to be so, people are not equal. Each has unique skills. To slot them all into the same hole requires force, control, draconian measures.
Ultimately, the desire for freedom that all human feel, breaks the system apart.
2) A country with wealth of, say, $1 billion and 2.5 million people, might divide the evenly, thinking that to be fair. But each person only gets $10, which won't go far.
Better to teach a man to fish, give him the opportunity to fish and find markets for his fish, so each man can make his own wealth.
Equality of opportunity is what is needed, not distribution of wealth, becaus the latter means killing the goose that lays the golden egg.
Sorry for the long post!
Post a Comment