Oh my.
If government hadn't bestowed upon Muslims the "most favoured group" status in all things, hatreds would not have developed.
They have been favoured:
- over Christians - in legal cases
- as immigrants, over locals - for services
- via immunity from the law - polygamy / Sharia
- in government-sponsored news coverage
- government largesse - our tax pounds funding Islamic groups.
The real solution is to remove this bias. Nothing more.
Why should it be too much to ask that all people should be equal under the law?
All the measures proposed just complicate things further and will, if executed, entrench the influence of Islamists in our society. It will be as hard to strip this away from government as paring down the civil service has proven to be.
The answer to any complex problem is to simplify, simplify, simplify. If the Conservative Party cannot do that, then it probably doesn't understand the problem well enough!
The 'solution' the government offers is a package that is absolutely certain to make tensions grow.
Related:
.bmp){kind=small}
9 comments:
Conservative party... sounds familiar. No, no hints, don't tell me. It'll come to me a minute. ;-)
...the Coalition is 'considering' creating a body to tackle "anti-Muslim hatred".
May I suggest that Baroness Uddin be appointed to head this body; it will save time finding someone corrupt enough to run it and, clearly as she hasn't been imprisioned and forced to repay the money, she still has the 'right' kind of contacts for this position.
Perhaps a position for Lord Ahmed? Someone else with important contacts, so important that he "...was jailed for 12 weeks for sending and receiving text messages while driving minutes before he was involved in a fatal motorway crash..." Luckily for him the judge believed Ahmed and "...made it clear that Ahmed’s text messaging had finished two minutes before the accident took place and was not connected to the crash..." So clearly Ahmed would not have been reading or composing another text at the time of the crash, even if the time of the crash could have been independently verified and matched against the texts which were established to have been sent whilst driving.
It doesn't matter that these people were created peers under New Labour, as the CONServatives and LimpDems are clearly pursuing the same policies.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/03/12/texting_peer_released/
XX Why should it be too much to ask that all people should be equal under the law? XX
Quite. And not just a U.K problem.
We have a Reichstag petition site here, similar to the British one.
The petition read (basically) "We want the same punishment for Turks (and other filthy arabs)who call us "Scheißdeutsch", as WE get for calling them "Scheißturke". (Only in more...."Parliamentary" language)
Care to guess what happened to that petition?
The communist shit bag, S.E.D functionary (ex (?)), and FDJ Tussi, Merkel herself, ordered the petition to be "taken down" from the site.
NOW, we are in a position where, not only, can we not get a prosecution for racism against us to court, or even taken as a police report, but we are not even allowed to ask for that situation to be remidied.
The way I see this, it is the HIGHEST form of racism.
What they are in fact saying is; "Oh but you are a stiff upperlipped German and are above being upset by such "triviallitys. But they are from immature, and backward cultures that need to have their feelings protected."
Whatever, their faces are a picture when you counter the "racist" screaming classes with accusations of "racism".
How in the hell could anyone thought it was a good idea to import intolerant people? How could anyone have thought that importing illiberal people would not be a threat to a nation's liberal traditions?
In Newcastle on Tyne recently Muslims wanted a church converted to a Mosque or Islamic school or something of that sort. Local BNP members went round the neighbourhood asking residents if they wanted planning permission to be granted for the above change. Out of several hundred respondents, not a single person was in favour of permission being granted.
The perverts that make up the local authority are now twiddling their fingers wondering what do do.
AE - yes, it's been a while. ;)
Unknown - don't give them any ideas!
FT - you have my full sympathies. What are Germans going to do to take their country back? How accurate are polls in Germany?
Silverfiddle - it's called "population replacement" and has been effectively used by totalitarian regimes to kill off cultures / nations. These people are traitors - nothing less.
Ralph - the perverts keep getting away with it, which encourages them to continue to ignore the electorate. They need to be taught a lesson.
XX Fausty said...
FT - you have my full sympathies. What are Germans going to do to take their country back? How accurate are polls in Germany? XX
Polls. Probably as trustworthy as those in Britain.
"Take the country back". We tried that once and the Brits and the Americans got upset and bombed Dresden.
O.K. So ALL the media run by Frankfurt school 68ers, whereby anything/party more "right wing" than Mother Theresa is immediately painted with the "neo nazi" brush, but it is mighty damn fine when those twats with the black clothes and face masks riot, or whatever.
Add a population that at the MOST have only had 60 years of "democcracy" in their whole history, ie, without secret police, etc, and are therefore, politically wise scarred of their own shadow, and you will see that those of us who are trying to remedy this are facing what MAY be seen as an "uphill battle".
As you've probably noticed, FT, our media behaves in the same way.
We're beginning to win the war against propaganda, though. More and more people are now turning the tables on the socialists and labeling them, at every opportunity. The funnier or more apt the label, the more it sticks.
Michael Shrimpton QC has been saying for years that Germany has never had a democracy - well, not since it became a country. I've no idea whether he's right on that score, but what he said about the EU has been dead accurate.
http://bit.ly/uWiban
XX Michael Shrimpton QC has been saying for years that Germany has never had a democracy - well, not since it became a country.XX
Weimar Republic was a democcracy. But even then, there were the "Political police".
Since 1949 HALF of Germany has had "democcracy", the other half had to wait until 1990.
What that boils down to is a population that has been terrified/"discouraged" to/from question/ing the "Government" (or "Authority") since the first tribes set foot here.
It is a long tradition to try and eradicate and will take generations, not a couple of parliaments.
Post a Comment